It's absolutely infuriating to see how the oil industry clings to outdated methods like crude oil fractional distillation while the world is screaming for innovation! Are we seriously still relying on these archaic distillation columns? The environmental impact is staggering, and yet, here we are, wasting our time and resources on a process that is as old as the hills. Fractional distillation might have been a breakthrough in its time, but today it's a glaring example of how stubbornness and lack of vision can hold us back. Let’s break this down. Crude oil is heated and separated based on boiling points – it sounds simple enough, but the reality is a massive energy drain and a ludicrously inefficient system. We’re burning fossil fuels just to get more fossil fuels! It’s like pouring gasoline on a fire and expecting it to go out. The emissions that come from this process are utterly disgusting, contributing to climate change and pollution at an alarming rate. And what are we doing about it? Absolutely nothing, as usual! Now, enter the game-changer: microporous polyimine membranes. Why aren’t we shouting from the rooftops about this revolutionary technology? This is the future of crude oil processing! These membranes offer a cleaner, more efficient alternative that could drastically reduce energy consumption and emissions. Yet, it seems like the industry is too comfortable in its old ways to even consider making a change. It’s baffling! We have scientists and engineers working tirelessly to develop these advanced materials, but what do we get in return? A big fat "no thanks" from an industry that has more than enough resources to implement this change. Instead of investing in modern solutions, they stick to the dinosaur methods. It’s not just a technological issue; it’s a colossal failure of imagination and responsibility towards our planet. And let's not forget the economic angle here. By replacing crude oil fractional distillation with microporous polyimine membranes, we could be looking at lower operational costs and greater efficiency. But the industry is too busy laughing all the way to the bank with their outdated practices. Why should they bother innovating when they can just keep milking the system for every dollar it’s worth? It's not just irresponsible; it’s downright reckless! We need to demand better from our industries. We need to hold these companies accountable for their outdated practices and push for the adoption of new technologies that can actually make a difference. The time for half-measures and empty promises is over. It’s time to replace crude oil fractional distillation with microporous polyimine membranes and take a real step towards a sustainable future. Enough is enough! #Innovation #CleanEnergy #OilIndustry #Sustainability #ClimateChange

It's absolutely infuriating to witness the hollow pretenses surrounding the B Corp certification process! The article "Engagement, structuration, communauté : notre cheminement vers la (re)certification B Corp" claims to showcase their journey towards B Corp certification as if it’s some grand achievement. What a farce! Let's get real here: is this certification truly a reflection of ethical business practices, or is it merely a shiny badge for companies to slap on their marketing material to look good while continuing their exploitative practices behind the scenes? The title speaks of "engagement" and "communauté," but where is the genuine commitment to these ideals? Too often, businesses chase after the B Corp label without any real intention of fostering social and environmental responsibility. They see it as a mere "leverage for acceleration," a marketing tool to boost their image, rather than a genuine transformation of their internal practices. This is a blatant misrepresentation of what it means to be a responsible company! Let’s talk about "structuration" — it sounds good in theory, but the reality is that many companies merely go through the motions. They create committees, hold meetings, and produce reports that look great on paper but lead to zero meaningful change. Are we really supposed to believe that these companies are being held accountable while they continue their business as usual? It’s maddening! There’s a glaring disconnect between what companies claim to do and what they actually deliver. The notion of recertification in 2025 is another way to distract us from the real issues at hand. It’s a repetitive cycle of superficial changes that don’t address the root problems. Just because a company can earn a certification doesn’t mean they’re ethical or sustainable. How many businesses are simply playing the game to keep their status, while the world burns around them? The B Corp certification process needs to be scrutinized deeply. It's time to question whether this system is truly serving the purpose it claims to champion or merely creating a facade for corporations that prioritize profit over people and the planet. The frustration lies not just in the companies that misuse this certification, but also in the complacency of consumers and advocates who accept these claims at face value. We must demand more transparency and accountability! The B Corp movement should be about real engagement, meaningful structuration, and genuine community-building, not just another marketing trend to exploit. It's time for all of us to wake up and push for a higher standard that goes beyond just a certification. If businesses want to flaunt their B Corp status, they better earn it through real change, not just shiny brochures and flashy campaigns. Let's stop giving them a free pass and start holding them accountable for actual impact! #BCorp #CorporateResponsibility #EthicalBusiness #Sustainability #Accountability

The exploitation of incarcerated individuals as firefighters in California is nothing short of a disgrace. This system, which has been in place since 1915, is a glaring example of how society can dehumanize and commodify the most vulnerable among us. While the Anti-Recidivism Coalition (ARC) is stepping in to provide quality food for these incarcerated firefighters, let's not kid ourselves—this is not a solution; it’s merely a band-aid on a festering wound. Why are we, as a society, comfortable with the idea of using incarcerated men and women to fight wildfires, often under harsh conditions and for a fraction of the pay that their free counterparts would receive? These individuals are being put in life-threatening situations, and for what? A few dollars a day? This is not just a crime against humanity; it’s a systematic failure of our justice system that perpetuates inequality and exploitation. The fact that this has been normalized for over a century is infuriating. We must ask ourselves: What kind of society allows for the incarceration of individuals to be synonymous with free labor? The Golden State, known for its progressiveness in many areas, remains stuck in the dark ages when it comes to the treatment of its incarcerated population. The idea that we can justify their involvement in firefighting because it 'helps' them is a thinly veiled excuse to exploit them for labor while simultaneously denying them basic rights and dignity. Yes, the ARC is helping by feeding more than 800 incarcerated firefighters, but where is the outrage over the entire system that allows this situation to exist in the first place? Feeding someone decent food while they are being exploited does not absolve society of its moral responsibilities. We need to demand comprehensive reform that not only acknowledges the contributions of these individuals but also ensures that they are treated with the dignity they deserve. This is not just about food; this is about justice. We need to dismantle the structures that allow for such exploitation to persist. Instead of celebrating the fact that someone is "feeding California’s incarcerated firefighters," we should be enraged that incarcerated individuals are still fighting fires for pennies on the dollar. This narrative must change, and it must change now. We cannot allow our society to continue to turn a blind eye to this grotesque reality. It's time to stand up and call for a complete overhaul of how we treat our incarcerated population, especially those who risk their lives battling wildfires. It’s time to demand change, to demand justice, and to put an end to this abhorrent practice once and for all. #IncarceratedFirefighters #CaliforniaWildfires #CriminalJusticeReform #EndExploitation #HumanRights

Meta has just unveiled its new smart glasses in collaboration with Oakley, and it’s about time someone called out this trend for what it is: a blatant attempt to capitalize on our obsession with technology while completely disregarding privacy and functionality. Seriously, do we really need these so-called "smart" glasses? What’s next? Smart contact lenses that monitor our heart rate while we’re trying to enjoy a moment of peace? This is absurd! Let’s break this down. Meta, a company that has been embroiled in controversy after controversy regarding data privacy, is now stepping into the realm of wearable tech with these new glasses. It’s like handing a fox the keys to the henhouse. Are we all just supposed to forget about the countless scandals where our personal data was mishandled, all for the sake of innovation? The audacity of Meta to dive deeper into our lives with these smart glasses while pretending to care about user security is nothing short of hypocritical! And what about Oakley? This collaboration feels like a desperate attempt to lend credibility to a product that is already laden with issues. Oakley has a reputation for creating high-quality eyewear, but aligning with a company like Meta just tarnishes that image. Are they really willing to sacrifice their integrity for a quick buck? This partnership screams of opportunism rather than genuine innovation. Let’s not ignore the practicality of these smart glasses. Are they designed to enhance our lives, or are they just another distraction? The last thing we need is another device that pulls our attention away from the real world and into the endless abyss of social media. We’re already bombarded with notifications and alerts on our phones; do we really want to see them projected onto our faces? This is an invasion of our daily lives that we did not ask for! Furthermore, the design of these glasses is likely to be a compromise between style and function, leaving users with a product that looks ridiculous and performs poorly. We’ve seen it time and time again: tech companies rush to release flashy products without considering user experience. It’s all about the hype, and consumers are left holding the bag with overpriced gadgets that don’t deliver on their promises. In conclusion, the launch of Meta’s new smart glasses in collaboration with Oakley is a glaring indication that we are headed down a dangerous path of technological dependency and disregard for privacy. Instead of being excited about this so-called "innovation," we should be outraged. We need to demand better from these companies that seem more interested in profit than in providing meaningful solutions. The future of technology shouldn’t be a world where we’re constantly monitored. It should be about enhancing our lives without intruding on our privacy. #Meta #SmartGlasses #Oakley #TechCritique #PrivacyMatters

It's utterly infuriating to witness the latest updates from Sessions 2025 being presented as groundbreaking advancements when, in reality, they seem to be just a series of half-baked features that do little to address the core issues facing users. Managing multiple payment providers within Stripe? Seriously? This should have been a basic feature from day one! Instead, we’re left to deal with a convoluted maze of payment options that can’t even function seamlessly together. How is it that in 2025, we’re still grappling with such elementary functionality? And let’s talk about the so-called "new extensibility primitives." What does that even mean? It sounds like a tech jargon dump designed to obscure the fact that there is a lack of real innovation. Users are crying out for straightforward, effective solutions, yet what do they get? A bunch of buzzwords that fail to translate into usable tools. The tech world is littered with these empty promises. Why should we trust that this iteration is any different? Support for turnkey consumer issuing programs? Give me a break! This is another example of a feature that will likely end up being more trouble than it’s worth. The last thing we need is another layer of complexity in a system that already struggles to deliver on its promises. It’s almost as if these updates are crafted in a bubble, disconnected from the actual needs and frustrations of the users who depend on them. And the new money management capabilities – what a joke! This sounds like the perfect excuse to slap an update on a product without actually fixing the underlying issues. Users are desperately trying to manage their finances and all we get are more ‘capabilities’ that don’t really simplify anything. It feels like we're being fed a constant stream of “enhancements” that barely scratch the surface of what is actually needed. At this point, it's clear that the focus is on adding features for the sake of appearances rather than crafting a genuinely useful product. It’s downright shameful that companies like Stripe continue to prioritize flashy updates over meaningful improvements. The end users deserve so much more than this lackluster attempt to impress. Let’s cut through the fluff and demand better. We need solutions that actually work, not just more options that fail to deliver. It’s time for these tech giants to wake up and realize that innovation should be about enhancing user experience and addressing real problems, not just creating an illusion of progress. Enough is enough! #TechCritique #UserExperience #InnovationFail #StripeUpdates #ConsumerRights